Descriptors
Documents disponibles dans cette catégorie (3)
Add the result to your basket Make a suggestion Refine your search Apply to external sourcesExtend search on down-posting(s)
Démence / Michel Kroes / Brussels [Belgium] : KCE = Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg = Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé = Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (2011)
![PDF [Open Access] (780 KB)](https://kce.docressources.info/styles/kce_cfess/images/globe.gif "PDF [Open Access] (780 KB)")
ISSN : D/2011/10.273/36 : € 0,00
Etude n° 2010-07
Languages : English (eng) French (fre)
Descriptors: Indexation
2010-07 ; Caregivers ; Dementia ; Nonpharmacological Treatment ; Pharmacology ; R160 ; Therapeutics
Classification
WT 155 Senile dementia. Alzheimer's diseaseAbstract: Les médicaments ne sont pas d’une grande utilité pour la prise en charge de la démence mais y a-t-il des solutions alternatives ? Le Centre fédéral d’expertise des soins de santé (KCE) a analysé trente formes de prise en charge non médicamenteuses. Des données scientifiques montrent l’efficacité de quatre d’entre elles. Le soutien psychologique, social et la formation de l’entourage sont à privilégier à domicile. En institution, la formation du personnel soignant diminue l’usage des moyens de contention. Enfin, l’activité physique et la stimulation des fonctions cognitives exercent un effet positif sur la personne souffrant de démence. Deux conditions pour le succès des ces interventions : un suivi professionnel régulier et un ajustement de l’intervention au patient et à son entourage. Force est de constater que les données scientifiques manquent pour tirer des conclusions relatives aux autres interventions. Contents note: 1 INTRODUCTION 3 -- 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY 3 -- 1.2 DEMENTIA 3 -- 1.2.1 A disease with consequences 3 -- 1.2.2 Diagnostic process 3 -- 1.2.3 Prevalence of dementia 4 -- 1.2.4 Types of dementia in Europe 4 -- 1.3 RESEARCH QUESTION 5 -- 2 METHODS 6 -- 2.1 INCLUSION CRITERIA 6 -- 2.2 LITERATURE SEARCH STRATEGY 8 -- 2.2.1 Phase I : systematic reviews 8 -- 2.2.2 Phase II : randomised controlled trials 9 -- 2.3 ASSESSING METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY AND RISK OF BIAS 9 -- 2.3.1 Systematic reviews 9 -- 2.3.2 Randomised controlled trials 10 -- 2.4 DATA EXTRACTION 10 -- 3 RESULTS 11 -- 3.1 METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS 11 -- 3.1.1 Systematic reviews 11 -- 3.1.2 Randomised controlled trials 13 -- 3.2 RESULTS BY INTERVENTION 16 -- 3.2.1 Cognition 16 -- 3.2.2 Emotion 19 -- 3.2.3 Sensory enhancement 20 -- 3.2.4 Daily activities 23 -- 3.2.5 Physical activity 23 -- 3.2.6 Communication/interaction/relationship interventions 24 -- 3.2.7 Environmental changes 25 -- 3.2.8 Nutrition 26 -- 3.2.9 Interventions primarily focused on caregivers 26 -- 3.2.10 Interventions for the informal caregivers and patients at home 27 -- 4 SUMMARY OF THE MAIN FINDINGS 31 -- 4.1 QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: SUMMARY TABLE 31 -- 4.2 MODERATE QUALITY OF EVIDENCE FOR SIX GROUPS OF INTERVENTIONS 33 -- 4.2.1 Multicomponent psychoeducation/psychosocial interventions : impact on caregivers -- outcomes and on institutionalisation 33 -- 4.2.2 Physical activity 33 -- 4.2.3 Staff education 33 -- 4.2.4 Cognitive stimulation / training 34 -- 4.3 LOW QUALITY OF EVIDENCE FOR SIXTEEN INTERVENTIONS 34 -- 4.4 NO RCT FOR SIX INTERVENTIONS 34 -- 5 DISCUSSION 35 -- 5.1 STRENGTHS OF THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW 35 -- 5.2 LIMITATIONS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS 35 -- 5.3 LACK OF EVIDENCE: SOME HYPOTHESES 35 -- 5.4 RESULTS: APPLICABLE TO ALL PATIENT SUBGROUPS ? 36 -- 5.5 RESULTS APPLICABLE TO ALL SETTINGS ? 36 -- 5.6 INTERVENTIONS TAILORED TO THE PATIENT AND INFORMAL CAREGIVER ARE MORE -- SUCCESSFUL 36 -- 5.7 ADAPTATION TO THE CULTURAL AND HEALTH CARE CONTEXT 37 -- 5.8 PERSPECTIVES 37 -- 5.9 SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH 37 -- 6 APPENDICES 38 -- 6.1 APPENDIX 1 MESH TERM : DEMENTIA 38 -- 6.2 APPENDIX 2 SEARCH STRATEGIES SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 38 -- 6.3 APPENDIX 3. WEBSITES ADDITIONAL HANDSEARCHING 50 -- 6.4 APPENDIX 4 QUALITY APPRAISAL FOR INCLUDED SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 52 -- 6.5 APPENDIX 5 DATA EXTRACTION TABLE FOR INCLUDED SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS -- (WITH A LOW RISK OF BIAS) 55 -- 6.6 APPENDIX 6 SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS EXCLUDED (HIGH RISK OF BIAS) 65 -- 6.7 APPENDIX 7 RCT SEARCH STRATEGIES 69 -- 6.8 APPENDIX 8 QUALITY APPRAISAL FOR RCTS 77 -- 6.9 APPENDIX 9. DATA EVIDENCE TABLES FOR THE 30 INCLUDED RCTS 95 -- 7 REFERENCES 114 Link for e-copy: https://doi.org/10.57598/R160B Format of e-copy: PDF [Open Access] (780 KB) Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=2625 Copies
Barcode Call number Media type Location Section Status No copy
ISSN : D/2011/10.273/37 : € 0,00
Study nr 2010-07
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: Indexation
2010-07 ; Caregivers ; Dementia ; Nonpharmacological Treatment ; Pharmacology ; R160 ; Therapeutics
Classification
WT 155 Senile dementia. Alzheimer's diseaseContents note: 1 INTRODUCTION 3 -- 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY 3 -- 1.2 DEMENTIA 3 -- 1.2.1 A disease with consequences 3 -- 1.2.2 Diagnostic process 3 -- 1.2.3 Prevalence of dementia 4 -- 1.2.4 Types of dementia in Europe 4 -- 1.3 RESEARCH QUESTION 5 -- 2 METHODS 6 -- 2.1 INCLUSION CRITERIA 6 -- 2.2 LITERATURE SEARCH STRATEGY 8 -- 2.2.1 Phase I : systematic reviews 8 -- 2.2.2 Phase II : randomised controlled trials 9 -- 2.3 ASSESSING METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY AND RISK OF BIAS 9 -- 2.3.1 Systematic reviews 9 -- 2.3.2 Randomised controlled trials 10 -- 2.4 DATA EXTRACTION 10 -- 3 RESULTS 11 -- 3.1 METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS 11 -- 3.1.1 Systematic reviews 11 -- 3.1.2 Randomised controlled trials 13 -- 3.2 RESULTS BY INTERVENTION 16 -- 3.2.1 Cognition 16 -- 3.2.2 Emotion 19 -- 3.2.3 Sensory enhancement 20 -- 3.2.4 Daily activities 23 -- 3.2.5 Physical activity 23 -- 3.2.6 Communication/interaction/relationship interventions 24 -- 3.2.7 Environmental changes 25 -- 3.2.8 Nutrition 26 -- 3.2.9 Interventions primarily focused on caregivers 26 -- 3.2.10 Interventions for the informal caregivers and patients at home 27 -- 4 SUMMARY OF THE MAIN FINDINGS 31 -- 4.1 QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: SUMMARY TABLE 31 -- 4.2 MODERATE QUALITY OF EVIDENCE FOR SIX GROUPS OF INTERVENTIONS 33 -- 4.2.1 Multicomponent psychoeducation/psychosocial interventions : impact on caregivers -- outcomes and on institutionalisation 33 -- 4.2.2 Physical activity 33 -- 4.2.3 Staff education 33 -- 4.2.4 Cognitive stimulation / training 34 -- 4.3 LOW QUALITY OF EVIDENCE FOR SIXTEEN INTERVENTIONS 34 -- 4.4 NO RCT FOR SIX INTERVENTIONS 34 -- 5 DISCUSSION 35 -- 5.1 STRENGTHS OF THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW 35 -- 5.2 LIMITATIONS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS 35 -- 5.3 LACK OF EVIDENCE: SOME HYPOTHESES 35 -- 5.4 RESULTS: APPLICABLE TO ALL PATIENT SUBGROUPS ? 36 -- 5.5 RESULTS APPLICABLE TO ALL SETTINGS ? 36 -- 5.6 INTERVENTIONS TAILORED TO THE PATIENT AND INFORMAL CAREGIVER ARE MORE -- SUCCESSFUL 36 -- 5.7 ADAPTATION TO THE CULTURAL AND HEALTH CARE CONTEXT 37 -- 5.8 PERSPECTIVES 37 -- 5.9 SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH 37 -- 6 APPENDICES 38 -- 6.1 APPENDIX 1 MESH TERM : DEMENTIA 38 -- 6.2 APPENDIX 2 SEARCH STRATEGIES SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 38 -- 6.3 APPENDIX 3. WEBSITES ADDITIONAL HANDSEARCHING 50 -- 6.4 APPENDIX 4 QUALITY APPRAISAL FOR INCLUDED SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 52 -- 6.5 APPENDIX 5 DATA EXTRACTION TABLE FOR INCLUDED SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS -- (WITH A LOW RISK OF BIAS) 55 -- 6.6 APPENDIX 6 SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS EXCLUDED (HIGH RISK OF BIAS) 65 -- 6.7 APPENDIX 7 RCT SEARCH STRATEGIES 69 -- 6.8 APPENDIX 8 QUALITY APPRAISAL FOR RCTS 77 -- 6.9 APPENDIX 9. DATA EVIDENCE TABLES FOR THE 30 INCLUDED RCTS 95 -- 7 REFERENCES 114 Link for e-copy: https://doi.org/10.57598/R160C Format of e-copy: PDF [Open Access] (767 KB) Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=2627 Copies
Barcode Call number Media type Location Section Status No copy
ISSN : D/2011/10.273/35 : € 0,00
Studie nr 2010-07
Languages : English (eng) Dutch (nla)
Descriptors: Indexation
2010-07 ; Caregivers ; Dementia ; Nonpharmacological Treatment ; Pharmacology ; R160 ; Therapeutics
Classification
WT 155 Senile dementia. Alzheimer's diseaseAbstract: Bij de behandeling van mensen met dementie zijn geneesmiddelen niet echt van groot nut, maar zijn er alternatieve oplossingen? Het Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg (KCE) onderzocht dertig vormen van aanpak zonder geneesmiddelen. Voor vier van hen vonden de onderzoekers voldoende betrouwbare studies die wijzen op werkzaamheid. Vooral het opleiden en psychosociaal ondersteunen van de mantelzorger blijkt doeltreffend te zijn. Aangepaste opleidingen aan zorgverleners verminderen het gebruik van dwangmaatregelen in instellingen. Lichaamsbeweging en stimulering van de cognitieve functies hebben een positief effect op de demente persoon zelf. Voorwaarde is dat deze behandelingen aangepast zijn aan de demente persoon en zijn omgeving en dat ze regelmatig opgevolgd worden door professionele zorgverleners. Voor de andere interventies waren er onvoldoende wetenschappelijke gegevens om conclusies te kunnen trekken. Contents note: 1 INTRODUCTION 3 -- 1.1 BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY 3 -- 1.2 DEMENTIA 3 -- 1.2.1 A disease with consequences 3 -- 1.2.2 Diagnostic process 3 -- 1.2.3 Prevalence of dementia 4 -- 1.2.4 Types of dementia in Europe 4 -- 1.3 RESEARCH QUESTION 5 -- 2 METHODS 6 -- 2.1 INCLUSION CRITERIA 6 -- 2.2 LITERATURE SEARCH STRATEGY 8 -- 2.2.1 Phase I : systematic reviews 8 -- 2.2.2 Phase II : randomised controlled trials 9 -- 2.3 ASSESSING METHODOLOGICAL QUALITY AND RISK OF BIAS 9 -- 2.3.1 Systematic reviews 9 -- 2.3.2 Randomised controlled trials 10 -- 2.4 DATA EXTRACTION 10 -- 3 RESULTS 11 -- 3.1 METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS 11 -- 3.1.1 Systematic reviews 11 -- 3.1.2 Randomised controlled trials 13 -- 3.2 RESULTS BY INTERVENTION 16 -- 3.2.1 Cognition 16 -- 3.2.2 Emotion 19 -- 3.2.3 Sensory enhancement 20 -- 3.2.4 Daily activities 23 -- 3.2.5 Physical activity 23 -- 3.2.6 Communication/interaction/relationship interventions 24 -- 3.2.7 Environmental changes 25 -- 3.2.8 Nutrition 26 -- 3.2.9 Interventions primarily focused on caregivers 26 -- 3.2.10 Interventions for the informal caregivers and patients at home 27 -- 4 SUMMARY OF THE MAIN FINDINGS 31 -- 4.1 QUALITY OF EVIDENCE: SUMMARY TABLE 31 -- 4.2 MODERATE QUALITY OF EVIDENCE FOR SIX GROUPS OF INTERVENTIONS 33 -- 4.2.1 Multicomponent psychoeducation/psychosocial interventions : impact on caregivers -- outcomes and on institutionalisation 33 -- 4.2.2 Physical activity 33 -- 4.2.3 Staff education 33 -- 4.2.4 Cognitive stimulation / training 34 -- 4.3 LOW QUALITY OF EVIDENCE FOR SIXTEEN INTERVENTIONS 34 -- 4.4 NO RCT FOR SIX INTERVENTIONS 34 -- 5 DISCUSSION 35 -- 5.1 STRENGTHS OF THE SYSTEMATIC REVIEW 35 -- 5.2 LIMITATIONS IN THE INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS 35 -- 5.3 LACK OF EVIDENCE: SOME HYPOTHESES 35 -- 5.4 RESULTS: APPLICABLE TO ALL PATIENT SUBGROUPS ? 36 -- 5.5 RESULTS APPLICABLE TO ALL SETTINGS ? 36 -- 5.6 INTERVENTIONS TAILORED TO THE PATIENT AND INFORMAL CAREGIVER ARE MORE -- SUCCESSFUL 36 -- 5.7 ADAPTATION TO THE CULTURAL AND HEALTH CARE CONTEXT 37 -- 5.8 PERSPECTIVES 37 -- 5.9 SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER RESEARCH 37 -- 6 APPENDICES 38 -- 6.1 APPENDIX 1 MESH TERM : DEMENTIA 38 -- 6.2 APPENDIX 2 SEARCH STRATEGIES SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 38 -- 6.3 APPENDIX 3. WEBSITES ADDITIONAL HANDSEARCHING 50 -- 6.4 APPENDIX 4 QUALITY APPRAISAL FOR INCLUDED SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 52 -- 6.5 APPENDIX 5 DATA EXTRACTION TABLE FOR INCLUDED SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS -- (WITH A LOW RISK OF BIAS) 55 -- 6.6 APPENDIX 6 SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS EXCLUDED (HIGH RISK OF BIAS) 65 -- 6.7 APPENDIX 7 RCT SEARCH STRATEGIES 69 -- 6.8 APPENDIX 8 QUALITY APPRAISAL FOR RCTS 77 -- 6.9 APPENDIX 9. DATA EVIDENCE TABLES FOR THE 30 INCLUDED RCTS 95 -- 7 REFERENCES 114 Link for e-copy: https://doi.org/10.57598/R160A Format of e-copy: PDF [Open Access] (785 KB) Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=2626 Copies
Barcode Call number Media type Location Section Status No copy
