Descriptors
Documents disponibles dans cette catégorie (4)
Add the result to your basket Make a suggestion Refine your search Apply to external sources
Extend search on down-posting(s)
2011 Survey of Health Care Consumers Global Report / Deloitte Center for Health Solutions / Deloitte Development (2011)
Capaciteitsplanning in de zorg / Bart Berden / Berlin : Springer (2016)
Capaciteitsplanning in de zorg [printed text] / Bart Berden, Author ; Léo Berrevoets ; Windi Winasti, Author . - Berlin : Springer, 2016 . - 286 p. : ill., ; 25 cm.
ISBN : 978-90-368-1339-6
Languages : Dutch (dut)
Descriptors: Classification
WA 525 Health Administration and Organization - General works
Indexation
Patient Care Management ; Patient Compliance ; Patient Satisfaction ; Physician-Patient Relations ; Risk ManagementAbstract:
Het uitgangspunt van dit boek is goede patiëntenzorg, kostenbeheersing en aantrekkelijk werkgeverschap. Zorg wordt geleverd door mensen. Een tevreden of ontevreden patiënt oordeelt vooral op basis van de inzet en het handelen van zorgverleners. Een zorginstelling bestaat, voor alles, uit medewerkers en niet uit apparatuur, stenen of (gratis) parkeerplaatsen. Het belang van de medewerker heeft geleid tot toenemende aandacht voor het personeelsbeleid. Dat geldt voor de volle breedte, van werving en selectie, matching van taken en competenties tot en met continue scholing en toetsing. Naar verhouding is er minder aandacht voor de planning van de inzet van medewerkers. Dat roept verbazing op. Een niet passende bezetting heeft aanzienlijke consequenties: via de niet gemotiveerde, onder- of overbelaste medewerkers kan het leiden tot mindere kwaliteit van zorg. Ook is het een directe aanslag op de doelmatigheid van de onderneming. Het is deze constatering die de verantwoording vormt voor het onderwerp van dit boek.Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4482 Hold
Place a hold on this item
Copies(1)
Barcode Call number Media type Location Section Status 10273-03387 WA 525 / BER Book KCE Library (10.124) Due for return by 09/30/2026 Readers who borrowed this document also borrowed:
Arts in het ziekenhuis De Witte, Karel Goed ziek De Ridder, R. BADS Directory of Procedures The system of care handbook Stroul, Beth A. The innovator's prescription Christensen, Clayton M. Gezondheidseconomie voor niet-economen Annemans, Lieven Learning for action Checkland, Peter Complex Interventions in Health Richards, David A. Safety in Numbers Gordon, Suzanne Emergency care and the public's health Pines, Jesse M. Big Data-Enabled Nursing Delaney, C.W Crossover comparison of efficacy and preference for rizatriptan 10 mg versus ergotamine/caffeine in migraine / S. Christie in European Neurology, 49(2003)01 ([01/01/2003])
[article] Crossover comparison of efficacy and preference for rizatriptan 10 mg versus ergotamine/caffeine in migraine [printed text] / S. Christie, Author ; H. Gobel, Author ; V. Mateos, Author ; C. Allen, Author ; France Vrijens , Author ; M. Shivaprakash, Author . - 2003 . - p.20-29.
Languages : English (eng)
in European Neurology > 49(2003)01 [01/01/2003] . - p.20-29
Descriptors: Classification
W 1 Serials. Periodicals
Indexation
Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Double-Blind Method ; Drug Combinations ; Journal Article ; Migraine Disorders ; Pain Measurement ; Patient Satisfaction ; Peer ReviewAbstract: Rizatriptan is a selective 5-HT(1B/1D) receptor agonist with rapid oral absorption and early onset of action in the acute treatment of migraine. This randomized double- blind crossover outpatient study assessed the preference for 1 rizatriptan 10 mg tablet to 2 ergotamine 1 mg/caffeine 100 mg tablets in 439 patients treating a single migraine attack with each therapy. Of patients expressing a preference (89.1%), more than twice as many preferred rizatriptan to ergotamine/caffeine (69.9 vs. 30.1%, p < or = 0.001). Faster relief of headache was the most important reason for preference, cited by 67.3% of patients preferring rizatriptan and 54.2% of patients who preferred ergotamine/caffeine. The co-primary endpoint of being pain free at 2 h was also in favor of rizatriptan. Forty-nine percent of patients were pain free 2 h after rizatriptan, compared with 24.3% treated with ergotamine/caffeine (p < or = 0.001), rizatriptan being superior within 1 h of treatment. Headache relief at 2 h was 75.9% for rizatriptan and 47.3% for ergotamine/caffeine (p < or = 0.001), with rizatriptan being superior to ergotamine/caffeine within 30 min of dosing. Almost 36% of patients taking rizatriptan were pain free at 2 h and had no recurrence or need for additional medication within 24 h, compared to 20% of patients on ergotamine/caffeine (p < or = 0.001). Rizatriptan was also superior to ergotamine/caffeine in the proportions of patients with no nausea, vomiting, phonophobia or photophobia and for patients with normal function 2 h after drug intake (p < or = 0.001). More patients were (completely, very or somewhat) satisfied 2 h after treatment with rizatriptan (69.8%) than at 2 h after treatment with ergotamine/caffeine (38.6%, p < or = 0.001). Recurrence rates were 31.4% with rizatriptan and 15.3% with ergotamine/caffeine. Both active treatments were well tolerated. The most common adverse events (incidence > or = 5% in one group) after rizatriptan and ergotamine/caffeine, respectively, were dizziness (6.7 and 5.3%), nausea (4.2 and 8.5%) and somnolence (5.5 and 2.3%). Link for e-copy: https://doi.org/10.1159/000067018 Format of e-copy: PDF [Requires Subscription] Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4092 [article]Measuring patient-reported outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients / Irina Cleemput in Pharmacoeconomics, 25(2007)4 ([04/01/2007])
[article] Measuring patient-reported outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients : an overview of instruments developed to date [printed text] / Irina Cleemput , Author ; F. Dobbels, Author . - 2007 . - 269-286.
Languages : English (eng)
in Pharmacoeconomics > 25(2007)4 [04/01/2007] . - 269-286
Descriptors: Classification
W 1 Serials. Periodicals
Indexation
Great Britain ; Humans ; Journal Article ; Patient Satisfaction ; Peer Review ; Psychometrics ; Quality of Life ; Transplants ; Treatment outcomeAbstract: Improvements in organ preservation methods, immunosuppressive regimens and general post-transplant care have resulted in an increased life expectancy and a continually decreasing morbidity after solid organ transplantation. As attention gradually moves towards improving subjective patient outcomes, the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROs) thus becomes increasingly important in post-transplant patient management. This paper provides a brief systematic overview of the transplant-specific PRO measures, and their psychometric properties, developed and used in solid organ transplant recipients to date. PRO measures may focus on or encompass different aspects of life relevant to organ transplant patients: overall quality of life (QOL), physical, psychological and social functioning, and adherence. Overall QOL can be measured using transplant-specific or generic QOL instruments, or a combination of both. In general, very little information is available on the psychometric properties of PRO measures, and there is no gold standard for PRO measurement. Transplant-specific and generic PRO instruments are complementary. Generic instruments will continue to be important for economic evaluations, but transplant-specific instruments may be more useful for patient management purposes, as they are generally more sensitive to small but clinically relevant changes in outcomes in transplant populations. Link for e-copy: http://adisonline.com/pharmacoeconomics/pages/default.aspx Format of e-copy: PDF [Requires Subscription] Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=2437 [article]