Descriptors
Classification > W - MEDICINE > WA - PUBLIC HEALTH > WA 525 Health Administration and Organization - General works
WA 525 Health Administration and Organization - General works |
Documents disponibles dans cette catégorie (35)
Add the result to your basket Make a suggestion Refine your search Apply to external sources
Extend search on down-posting(s)
An evaluation protocol for NIHDI conventions / Philippe Vandenbroeck / Brussels [Belgium] : KCE = Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg = Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé = Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (2018)
An evaluation protocol for NIHDI conventions [printed text] / Philippe Vandenbroeck, Author ; Wendy Christiaens , Author ; Marie Dauvrin , Author ; Rachel Wickert, Author ; Kim Becher, Author ; Erik Hendrickx, Author ; Jo Goossens, Author ; Liesbeth Jenné, Author ; Marijke Eyssen , Author . - Brussels [Belgium] : KCE = Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg = Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé = Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, 2018 . - 65 p. : ill., ; A4. - (KCE Reports. Health Services Research (HSR); 299C) .
ISSN : D/2018/10.273/21 : € 0,00
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: Classification
WA 525 Health Administration and Organization - General works
Indexation
2015-18 ; Ambulatory Care ; Chronic Disease ; Efficiency, Organizational ; Long-Term Care ; Multidisciplinary team (MDT) ; Organizational Innovation ; Patient Care Team ; Quality of Health Care ; R299 ; RehabilitationContents note: SCIENTIFIC REPORT 1 -- 1 INTRODUCTION 1 -- 1.1 CONVENTIONS AS A MODEL TO FINANCE/REIMBURSE CARE 1 -- 1.2 CONVENTIONS AS A MODEL TO FINANCE/REIMBURSE CARE 4 -- 1.3 CONVENTIONS AS AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NIHDI AND CARE INSTITUTIONS 4 -- 1.3.1 The role of the Board of Medical Directors and the Insurance Committee 4 -- 1.3.2 Overview of the content of the agreement 6 -- 1.3.3 Duration of conventions .8 -- 1.3.4 Existing measures for quality assurance 8 -- 2 SCOPE 9 -- 2.1 CONVENTIONS ARE USED FOR REHABILITATION AND OTHER HEALTH-RELATED CONDITIONS .9 -- 2.2 CONVENTIONS TRANSFERRED TO THE COMMUNITIES 10 -- 2.3 CONCEPTUAL LEVELS 10 -- 3 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 11 -- 4 A TYPOLOGY OF CONVENTIONS 11 -- 5 QUALITY EVALUATION IN HEALTH CARE: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE 12 -- 5.1 SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE COUNTRIES INCLUDED IN THE INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON 12 -- 5.1.1 France 12 -- 5.1.2 Scotland 13 -- 5.1.3 The Netherlands 13 -- 5.2 ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE IN FOUR COUNTRIES: METHODOLOGY 13 -- 5.2.1 Scope of the literature search 13 -- 5.2.2 Search process 14 -- 5.2.3 Analysis 14 -- 5.2.4 Validation by country experts 15 -- 5.3 CROSS-COMPARISON OF THE QUALITY EVALUATION 15 -- 5.4 THE ORGANISATION OF CARE AND FINANCING OF FOUR EXAMPLES OF HEALTH CONDITIONS AND DISEASES 19 -- 5.4.1 In France 19 -- 5.4.2 In Scotland 20 -- 5.4.3 In the Netherlands 21 -- 6 TOWARDS A META-EVALUATION PROTOCOL 22 -- 6.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 22 -- 6.1.1 A soft systems-inspired approach 22 -- 6.1.2 Operationalisation of the approach 26 -- 6.2 FINDINGS 29 -- 6.2.1 Root definition of a rehabilitation convention 29 -- 6.2.2 VSM-based activity models 30 -- 6.2.3 Measures of performance 34 -- 6.2.4 Perceived strengths and weaknesses of conventions as a financing and operational instrument 34 -- 6.2.5 Perceived weaknesses of conventions contextualised in the VSM-based activity models 41 -- 6.2.6 Reframing of the research question 45 -- 6.3 OUTLINE OF A META-EVALUATION PROTOCOL 47 -- 6.3.1 Preliminary outline of a meta-evaluation protocol 47 -- 6.3.2 Validation in a stakeholder workshop 50 -- 6.3.3 Validation with the Board of Medical Directors 55 -- 6.3.4 Fine-tuning in collaboration with clinical professionals 56 -- 6.3.5 Final version of a meta-evaluation protocol 58 -- REFERENCE LIST 63 Link for e-copy: https://doi.org/10.57598/R299C Format of e-copy: PDF (1,2 MB) Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4365 Copies(0)
Status No copy An evaluation protocol for NIHDI conventions / Philippe Vandenbroeck / Brussels [Belgium] : KCE = Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg = Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé = Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (2018)
An evaluation protocol for NIHDI conventions : Supplement [printed text] / Philippe Vandenbroeck, Author ; Wendy Christiaens , Author ; Marie Dauvrin , Author ; Rachel Wickert, Author ; Kim Becher, Author ; Erik Hendrickx, Author ; Jo Goossens, Author ; Liesbeth Jenné, Author ; Marijke Eyssen , Author . - Brussels [Belgium] : KCE = Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg = Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé = Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, 2018 . - 109 p. : ill., ; A4. - (KCE Reports. Health Services Research (HSR); 299S) .
ISSN : D/2018/10.273/22 : € 0,00
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: Classification
WA 525 Health Administration and Organization - General works
Indexation
2015-18 ; Ambulatory Care ; Chronic Disease ; Efficiency, Organizational ; Long-Term Care ; Multidisciplinary team (MDT) ; Organizational Innovation ; Patient Care Team ; Quality of Health Care ; R299 ; RehabilitationContents note: PPENDIX REPORT 1 -- TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 -- LIST OF FIGURES 6 -- LIST OF TABLES 6 -- APPENDIX 1 LIST OF REHABILITATION CONVENTIONS 11 -- APPENDIX 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE QUALITY ASSESSMENT IN BELGIUM, FRANCE, SCOTLAND -- AND THE NETHERLANDS 13 -- APPENDIX 2.1 BELGIUM 13 -- APPENDIX 2.2 FRANCE 16 -- APPENDIX 2.3 SCOTLAND 19 -- APPENDIX 2.4 THE NETHERLANDS 23 -- APPENDIX 3 - THE ORGANISATION OF CARE AND FINANCING OF FOUR EXAMPLES OF HEALTH -- CONDITIONS AND DISEASES 27 -- 1 INTRODUCTION 27 -- 2 FRANCE 27 -- 2.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE FRENCH HEALTH CARE SYSTEM 27 -- 2.1.1 Governance and organisation of the health care system 27 -- 2.1.2 Chronic diseases 28 -- 2.1.3 Rehabilitation and intermediate care 30 -- 2.1.4 Quality and safety monitoring in the health care system 31 -- 2.2 DIABETES 32 -- 2.2.1 Supporting policies and governance 32 -- 2.2.2 Organization and funding of health care 32 -- 2.2.3 Care pathways 33 -- 2.2.4 Health networks 33 -- 2.2.5 Therapeutic education 34 -- 2.2.6 SOPHIA program for improving patient support 34 -- 2.2.7 ASALEE protocol in first line of care 34 -- 2.2.8 Patient participation 35 -- 2.2.9 Evaluation 35 -- 2.3 STROKE 35 -- 2.3.1 Supporting policies and governance 35 -- 2.3.2 Organisation and funding of health care 35 -- 2.3.3 Patient participation 35 -- 2.3.4 Evaluation 36 -- 2.4 HAEMOPHILIA 36 -- 2.4.1 Supporting policies and governance 36 -- 2.4.2 Organisation and funding of health care 36 -- 2.4.3 Patient-level care 38 -- 2.4.4 Patient participation 38 -- 2.4.5 Evaluation 38 -- 2.5 FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATIONS 38 -- 2.5.1 Supporting policies and governance 38 -- 2.5.2 Organisation and funding of health care 39 -- 2.5.3 Patient participation 39 -- 2.5.4 Evaluation 39 -- 2.6 SUMMARY TABLE 39 -- 3 SCOTLAND 40 -- 3.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE SCOTTISH HEALTH CARE SYSTEM 40 -- 3.1.1 Organisation and governance of the health care system 40 -- 3.1.2 Intermediate care sector 41 -- 3.1.3 Patient participation 42 -- 3.1.4 Quality objectives 42 -- 3.2 DIABETES 43 -- 3.2.1 Supporting policies and governance 43 -- 3.2.2 Organisation and funding of health care 43 -- 3.2.3 Patient-level care 44 -- 3.2.4 Patient participation 44 -- 3.2.5 Evaluation 44 -- 3.3 STROKE 45 -- 3.3.1 Supporting policies and governance 45 -- 3.3.2 Organisation and funding of health care 45 -- 3.3.3 Patient level of care 46 -- 3.3.4 Patient participation 49 -- 3.3.5 Evaluation 49 -- 3.4 HAEMOPHILIA 49 -- 3.4.1 Supporting policies and governance 49 -- 3.4.2 Organisation and funding of health care 50 -- 3.4.3 Patient participation 51 -- 3.4.4 Evaluation of the system 51 -- 3.5 FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION 51 -- 3.5.1 Supporting policies and governance 51 -- 3.5.2 Organisation and funding of health care 52 -- 3.5.3 Patient participation 52 -- 3.5.4 Evaluation of the system 52 -- 3.6 SUMMARY TABLE 53 -- 4 THE NETHERLANDS 54 -- 4.1 DESCRIPTION OF THE DUTCH HEALTH CARE SYSTEM 54 -- 4.1.1 Dutch health care policy and financing 54 -- 4.1.2 Curative care 54 -- 4.1.3 Long-term care 55 -- 4.1.4 Dutch health care organization 56 -- 4.2 DIABETES IN THE NETHERLANDS 59 -- 4.2.1 Supporting policies and governance 59 -- 4.2.2 Organization and funding of health care 60 -- 4.2.3 Evaluation 61 -- 4.3 STROKE/CVA/CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES AND RISK MANAGEMENT 62 -- 4.3.1 Organization and funding of health care 62 -- 4.3.2 Patient participation 65 -- 4.3.3 Evaluation 65 -- 4.4 HEMOPHILIA 65 -- 4.4.1 Supporting policies and governance 65 -- 4.4.2 Organization and funding of health care 66 -- 4.4.3 Evaluation 66 -- 4.5 FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION 67 -- 4.5.1 Supporting policies and governance 67 -- 4.5.2 Notification code domestic violence (Meldcode intrafamiliaal geweld) 67 -- 4.5.3 Prevention FGM 67 -- 4.5.4 Example protocol medical care after FGM 67 -- 4.6 SUMMARY TABLE 68 -- 5 CROSS COMPARISON 69 -- 5.1 GENERAL COMMENTS 69 -- 5.1.1 Provision of a setting for the organization and provision of multidisciplinary rehabilitation and care 69 -- 5.1.2 Provision of space for innovative, future-oriented practices 69 -- 5.1.3 Simulation of specialization, concentration of expertise and networking 69 -- 5.1.4 Enhancing ease of financing 70 -- 5.1.5 Provision of low-threshold and affordable care to patients 70 -- 5.1.6 Factors supporting the development of ad hoc rehabilitation programs 70 -- 5.2 SUMMARY TABLE 71 -- APPENDIX 4 LIST OF PARTICIPANTS TO STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP 75 -- APPENDIX 5 SUMMARY PRESENTATION USED AT THE STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP 76 -- APPENDIX 6 COMMENTS TO A PRELIMINARY VERSION OF THE META-EVALUATION -- INSTRUMENT BY A REPRESENTATIVE OF A SUBSET OF MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE -- CONVENTIONS 94 -- APPENDIX 6.1 FINE-TUNING IN COLLABORATION WITH A REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SUBSET OF ‘MULTIDISCIPLINARY CARE’ CONVENTIONS 94 -- REFERENCES 101 Link for e-copy: https://doi.org/10.57598/R299S Format of e-copy: PDF (4 MB) Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4366 Analyse décisionnelle multicritères pour l’évaluation des besoins médicaux / Irina Cleemput / Brussels [Belgium] : KCE = Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg = Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé = Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (2016)
Analyse décisionnelle multicritères pour l’évaluation des besoins médicaux : étude pilote – Synthèse [printed text] / Irina Cleemput , Author ; Stephan Devriese , Author ; Wendy Christiaens , Author ; Laurence Kohn , Author . - Brussels [Belgium] : KCE = Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg = Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé = Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, 2016 . - 20 p. : ill., ; A4. - (KCE Reports B. Health Services Research (HSR); 272BS) .
ISSN : D/2016/10.273/66 : € 0,00
Etude 2014-06
Languages : French (fre)
Descriptors: Classification
WA 525 Health Administration and Organization - General works
Indexation
2014-06 ; Decision Making ; Decision Support Techniques ; Needs Assessment ; R272Abstract: Dans notre pays comme dans beaucoup d’autres, les décisions de remboursement de médicaments sont prises sans tenir compte explicitement des opinions et préférences des citoyens et des patients. L’INAMI souhaite que cela change ; c’est pourquoi il avait été demandé, en 2014, au Centre Fédéral d’Expertise des Soins de santé (KCE) d’identifier les critères que les citoyens trouvent les plus importants lors de ces décisions. Aujourd’hui, le KCE propose un premier exercice de mise en pratique de ces critères dans la rédaction de la liste des « besoins médicaux non rencontrés ». La méthode développée par le KCE permet d’établir cette liste en tenant explicitement compte des préférences des citoyens et des besoins réels des patients, plutôt que de la baser, comme aujourd’hui, sur les produits en attente dans le pipeline de l’industrie. Avec cette première initative, dont on peut espérer qu’elle sera rapidement élargie à toutes les décisions de remboursement, la Belgique se profile en pionnier de l’implication du citoyen et du patient dans la politique de santé. Cet exercice de participation est donc suivi avec attention dans les autres pays. Contents note: PRÉFACE 1 -- SYNTHÈSE 2 -- 1 CONTEXTE 3 -- 2 OBJECTIF DE CETTE ÉTUDE 5 -- 3 RÉDACTION DE LA LISTE À L’AIDE DE LA MÉTHODE MCDA 6 -- 3.1 DES BESOINS THERAPEUTIQUES ET SOCIETAUX PLUTOT QUE MEDICAUX 6 -- 3.2 CHOIX ET PONDERATION DES CRITERES 7 -- 3.3 CLASSEMENT DES PATHOLOGIES A L’AIDE D’UNE MCDA 10 -- 3.4 POURQUOI COTER/PONDERER SEPAREMENT LES BESOINS THERAPEUTIQUES ET SOCIETAUX ? 12 -- 3.5 DES OUTILS POUR INTRODUIRE LA MÉTHODE MCDA.13 -- 4 LA MÉTHODE MISE A L’ÉPREUVE 13 -- 4.1 PAR QUI ? 13 -- 4.2 COMMENT AVONS-NOUS PROCEDE? 13 -- 4.3 QUELS RESULTATS EN TERMES DE CLASSEMENT ? 14 -- 4.3.1 Pour les besoins thérapeutiques 14 -- 4.3.2 Pour les besoins sociétaux 15 -- 5 CONCLUSION 15 -- 5.1 LA MCDA EST APPLICABLE ET UTILISABLE 15 -- 5.2 LA DEFINITION DES « BESOINS MEDICAUX » SELON L’INAMI DIFFERE DE CELLE DE L’AFMPS 16 -- 5.3 UNE LISTE BASEE SUR LES BESOINS REELS DES PATIENTS ET DE LA SOCIETE PLUTÔT QUE SUR L’OFFRE DE L’INDUSTRIE 16 -- RECOMMANDATIONS 18 -- REFERENCES 20 Link for e-copy: https://doi.org/10.57598/R272BS Format of e-copy: PDF (772 Kb) Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=3881
CABIG Compatibility Guidelines Revision 2 [printed text] . - Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG™), 2005 . - 14 p. : ill. ; A4.
€ 0,00
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: Classification
WA 525 Health Administration and Organization - General works
Indexation
Financial ManagementAbstract: The purpose of this document is to provide the cancer Biomedical Informatics GridTM (caBIGTM) community with compatibility guidelines for creating and adopting software systems that are syntactically and semantically interoperable. The guidance contained herein is intended to support the evaluation of existing systems and to inform the designs of new systems. This document focuses on issues related to the representation of, access to, and exchange between biomedical informatics resources. Requirements for integration and use of the caBIG standards management infrastructure are also addressed. However, with few exceptions, a particular technology implementation of a given system or tool is not specified. Contents note: INTRODUCTION 3 -- COMPATIBILITY MATRIX 7 -- COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINE DETAILS 8 -- ABOUT THE CABIG COMPATIBILITY GUIDELINES 13 -- USEFUL LINKS AND RESOURCES 14 Link for e-copy: https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/guidelines_documentation/caBIGCompatGuideRev2_final.pd [...] Format of e-copy: PDF (160 KB) Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=2481
CABIG™ STRATEGIC PLAN 2005 [printed text] . - Cancer Biomedical Informatics Grid (caBIG™), 2005 . - 30 : ill. ; A4.
€ 0,00
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: Classification
WA 525 Health Administration and Organization - General works
Indexation
Clinical Trials ; NeoplasmsContents note: 1.0 VISION STATEMENT 3 -- 2.0 MISSION STATEMENT 3 -- 3.0 GOALS4 -- Appendices 20 -- Appendix A – Clinical Trial Management Systems Projects 21 -- Appendix B - Integrative Cancer Research Development Projects 23 -- Appendix C – Tissue Banks and Pathology Tools Workspace Development Projects 28 -- Appendix D – Workspace Points of Contact 30 Link for e-copy: https://cabig.nci.nih.gov/archive/caBIG_StrategicPlanning/Documents/caBIG_2005_S [...] Format of e-copy: PDF (719 Kb) Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=2480 Capaciteitsplanning in de zorg / Bart Berden / Berlin : Springer (2016)
PermalinkChild and Adolescent Mental Health Services / Greg Richardson / RCPsych Publications (2010)
PermalinkCross-Border Health Care in Europe / Luigi Bertinato / Brussels [Belgium] : European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (2005)
PermalinkDrempelwaarden voor kosteneffectiviteit in de gezondheidszorg / Irina Cleemput ; Mattias Neyt ; Nancy Thiry ; Chris De Laet ; Mark Leys / Brussels [Belgium] : KCE = Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg = Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé = Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (2008)
PermalinkEen evaluatieprotocol voor RIZIV conventies / Philippe Vandenbroeck / Brussels [Belgium] : KCE = Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg = Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé = Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (2018)
PermalinkHealth Care Payors & Providers Practice / McKinsey&Company (2008)
PermalinkHealth in All Policies / Timo Stahl / Brussels [Belgium] : European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies (2006)
PermalinkHealth insurance reform in the Netherlands / Yvette Bartholomée in Eurohealth, 12(2006)2 ([03/16/2007])
PermalinkImplementatie, effectieve verandering in de patiëntenzorg / Richard Grol / Maarsen : Elsevier gezondheidszorg (2001)
PermalinkImproving Patient Care / Richard Grol / Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann (2005)
Permalink