Author details
Author C.G. Tropé |
Available item(s) by this author (1)
Add the result to your basket Make a suggestion Refine your search Apply to external sources
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer / Ignace Vergote in The New England journal of medicine, 363(2010)10 ([09/02/2010])
[article] Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer [printed text] / Ignace Vergote, Author ; C.G. Tropé, Author ; Gunnar B. Kristensen, Author ; Tom Ehlen, Author ; Nick Johnson, Author ; Rene H.M. Verheijen, Author ; Maria E.L. van der Burg, Author ; A.J. Lacave, Author ; P.B. Panici, Author ; G.G. Kenter, Author ; A. Casado, Author ; Corneel Coens, Author ; Leen Verleye, Author ; Gavin Stuart, Author ; S. Pecorelli, Author ; Nick S. Reed, Author . - 2010 . - 943-53.
Languages : English (eng)
in The New England journal of medicine > 363(2010)10 [09/02/2010] . - 943-53
Descriptors: Classification
W 1 Serials. Periodicals
Indexation
Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Antineoplastic Agents ; Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ; drug therapy ; Humans ; Intention to Treat Analysis ; Middle Aged ; Multivariate analysis ; Neoadjuvant Therapy ; Neoplasm Staging ; Ovarian Neoplasms ; Peer Review ; Proportional Hazards Models ; Quality of Life ; Survival AnalysisAbstract: BACKGROUND: Primary debulking surgery before initiation of chemotherapy has been the standard of care for patients with advanced ovarian cancer.
METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma, fallopian-tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma to primary debulking surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy or to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery (so-called interval debulking surgery).
RESULTS: Of the 670 patients randomly assigned to a study treatment, 632 (94.3%) were eligible and started the treatment. The majority of these patients had extensive stage IIIC or IV disease at primary debulking surgery (metastatic lesions that were larger than 5 cm in diameter in 74.5% of patients and larger than 10 cm in 61.6%). The largest residual tumor was 1 cm or less in diameter in 41.6% of patients after primary debulking and in 80.6% of patients after interval debulking. Postoperative rates of adverse effects and mortality tended to be higher after primary debulking than after interval debulking. The hazard ratio for death (intention-to-treat analysis) in the group assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking, as compared with the group assigned to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy, was 0.98 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.13; P=0.01 for noninferiority), and the hazard ratio for progressive disease was 1.01 (90% CI, 0.89 to 1.15). Complete resection of all macroscopic disease (at primary or interval surgery) was the strongest independent variable in predicting overall survival.
CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery was not inferior to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy as a treatment option for patients with bulky stage IIIC or IV ovarian carcinoma in this study. Complete resection of all macroscopic disease, whether performed as primary treatment or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, remains the objective whenever cytoreductive surgery is performed. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003636.)
Link for e-copy: http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa0908806 Format of e-copy: PDF [Open Access] Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=2737 [article]