An evaluation protocol for NIHDI conventions [printed text] / Philippe Vandenbroeck, Author ; Wendy Christiaens  , Author ; Marie Dauvrin, Author ; Rachel Wickert, Author ; Kim Becher, Author ; Erik Hendrickx, Author ; Jo Goossens, Author ; Liesbeth Jenné, Author ; Marijke Eyssen , Author . - Brussels (Doorbuilding (10th), Bld Jardin Botanique, 55, 1000, Belgium) : KCE = Federaal Kenniscentrum voor de Gezondheidszorg = Centre Fédéral d'Expertise des Soins de Santé = Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre, 2018 . - 65 p. : ill., ; A4. - ( KCE Reports. Health Services Research (HSR); 299) . ISSN : D/2018/10.273/21 : € 0,00 Languages : English ( eng) | Descriptors: |
Classification
WA 525 Health Administration and Organization - General works
Indexation
2015-18 ; Ambulatory Care ; Chronic Disease ; Efficiency, Organizational ; Long-Term Care ; Multidisciplinary team (MDT) ; Organizational Innovation ; Patient Care Team ; Quality of Health Care ; R299 ; Rehabilitation
|
| Contents note: |
SCIENTIFIC REPORT 1 -- 1 INTRODUCTION 1 -- 1.1 CONVENTIONS AS A MODEL TO FINANCE/REIMBURSE CARE 1 -- 1.2 CONVENTIONS AS A MODEL TO FINANCE/REIMBURSE CARE 4 -- 1.3 CONVENTIONS AS AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE NIHDI AND CARE INSTITUTIONS 4 -- 1.3.1 The role of the Board of Medical Directors and the Insurance Committee 4 -- 1.3.2 Overview of the content of the agreement 6 -- 1.3.3 Duration of conventions .8 -- 1.3.4 Existing measures for quality assurance 8 -- 2 SCOPE 9 -- 2.1 CONVENTIONS ARE USED FOR REHABILITATION AND OTHER HEALTH-RELATED CONDITIONS .9 -- 2.2 CONVENTIONS TRANSFERRED TO THE COMMUNITIES 10 -- 2.3 CONCEPTUAL LEVELS 10 -- 3 RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 11 -- 4 A TYPOLOGY OF CONVENTIONS 11 -- 5 QUALITY EVALUATION IN HEALTH CARE: AN INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE 12 -- 5.1 SHORT DESCRIPTION OF THE COUNTRIES INCLUDED IN THE INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON 12 -- 5.1.1 France 12 -- 5.1.2 Scotland 13 -- 5.1.3 The Netherlands 13 -- 5.2 ASSESSMENT OF QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE IN FOUR COUNTRIES: METHODOLOGY 13 -- 5.2.1 Scope of the literature search 13 -- 5.2.2 Search process 14 -- 5.2.3 Analysis 14 -- 5.2.4 Validation by country experts 15 -- 5.3 CROSS-COMPARISON OF THE QUALITY EVALUATION 15 -- 5.4 THE ORGANISATION OF CARE AND FINANCING OF FOUR EXAMPLES OF HEALTH CONDITIONS AND DISEASES 19 -- 5.4.1 In France 19 -- 5.4.2 In Scotland 20 -- 5.4.3 In the Netherlands 21 -- 6 TOWARDS A META-EVALUATION PROTOCOL 22 -- 6.1 APPROACH AND METHODOLOGY 22 -- 6.1.1 A soft systems-inspired approach 22 -- 6.1.2 Operationalisation of the approach 26 -- 6.2 FINDINGS 29 -- 6.2.1 Root definition of a rehabilitation convention 29 -- 6.2.2 VSM-based activity models 30 -- 6.2.3 Measures of performance 34 -- 6.2.4 Perceived strengths and weaknesses of conventions as a financing and operational instrument 34 -- 6.2.5 Perceived weaknesses of conventions contextualised in the VSM-based activity models 41 -- 6.2.6 Reframing of the research question 45 -- 6.3 OUTLINE OF A META-EVALUATION PROTOCOL 47 -- 6.3.1 Preliminary outline of a meta-evaluation protocol 47 -- 6.3.2 Validation in a stakeholder workshop 50 -- 6.3.3 Validation with the Board of Medical Directors 55 -- 6.3.4 Fine-tuning in collaboration with clinical professionals 56 -- 6.3.5 Final version of a meta-evaluation protocol 58 -- REFERENCE LIST 63 |
| Link for e-copy: |
https://kce.fgov.be/sites/default/files/atoms/files/KCE_299_Evaluation_protocol_ [...] |
| Format of e-copy: |
PDF (1,2 MB) |
| Record link: |
http://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4365 |
|  |
Add the result to your basket Make a suggestion Refine your search Apply to external sources10 health questions about the 10 / Denmark : World Health Organization (2004)
Annual statistics of the Belgian Cancer Registry / Brussel [Belgium] : Stichting Kankerregister = Fondation Registre du Cance (1999)
