Descriptors
Documents disponibles dans cette catégorie (3)
Add the result to your basket Make a suggestion Refine your search Apply to external sources
Extend search on down-posting(s)
[serial] See available issues Search in serial BMC medical education = BMC Med Educ [printed text] / Clare Partridge, Editor . - London [UK] : BioMed Central Ltd, 2001.
ISSN : 1472-6920
IF: http://www.springer.com/education+%26+language/journal/12909
SJR: http://www.scimagojr.com/journalsearch.php?q=28099&tip=sid&clean=0
Indexed in:
Index medicus: v1, 2001-
MEDLINE: v1, 2001-
PubMed: v1, 2001-
PMC
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: Classification
W 1 Serials. Periodicals
Indexation
Education, Medical, Continuing ; Health Care ; Health Education ; Peer Review ; PeriodicalsAbstract: BMC Medical Education is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the training of healthcare professionals, including undergraduate, postgraduate, and continuing education. The journal has a special focus on curriculum development, evaluations of performance, assessment of training needs and evidence-based medicine. BMC Medical Education (ISSN 1472-6920) is indexed/tracked/covered by PubMed, MEDLINE, CAS, EMBASE, Scopus, Cinahl and Google Scholar. Link for e-copy: https://bmcmededuc.biomedcentral.com/about Format of e-copy: Website Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=4045 Essential guide to educational supervision in postgraduate medical education / Nicola Cooper ; Kirsty Forrest / Chichester, West Sussex, UK : Blackwell Pub. (2009)
Essential guide to educational supervision in postgraduate medical education [printed text] / Nicola Cooper ; Kirsty Forrest . - Chichester, West Sussex, UK : Blackwell Pub., 2009 . - 200 p.
ISBN : 978-1-4051-7071-0 : € 40,90
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: Indexation
Clinical Competence ; Education, Medical, Continuing ; Education, Medical, Graduate ; Mentors ; Teaching ; Vocational Guidance
Classification
W 20 Graduate and continuing medical educationAbstract: The world of postgraduate medical education is changing, and educational supervisors need the knowledge and skills to be able to do their job effectively. Many of those who want to do this job well feel unprepared for the task.
Essential Guide to Educational Supervision is a handbook for educational supervisors everywhere. The topics covered are generic to medical education, whatever the specialty. Although the focus is on postgraduate medical education, many of the topics in this book are also applicable to undergraduates.
Essential Guide to Educational Supervision is written for:
* Consultants and General Practitioners who work with trainees
* Educational supervisors
* People who organise postgraduate training programmes
Written by experts in their field, each chapter gives an overview of key topics in educational supervision with references and further resources. The book provides evidence and theory when applicable, but is deliberately practical, with case studies and tips for good practice as well.Contents note: Foreword. -- Introduction. -- 1. How to be an educational supervisor. Carolyn Evans. -- 2. Personal support and mentoring. Judy McKimm. -- 3. Dealing with doctors in difficulty. Rosalind Roden. -- 4. Career planning and advice. Jane Howard and David Clegg. -- 5. Putting a curriculum into practice. Nicola Cooper and Colin Melville. -- 6. Teaching and learning. Kirsty Forrest and Sean Williamson. -- 7. Introducing narrative reflection. Kathy Feest. -- 8. Assessments and appraisal. Julian Archer. -- 9. The role of information technology. Sean Smith. -- 10. Quality assurance. Jonathan Beard and Nicola Cooper. -- Appendix 1 Judy McKimm and Rosalind Roden. -- Appendix 2 Alastair McGowan Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=1548 Hold
Place a hold on this item
Copies(1)
Barcode Call number Media type Location Section Status 10273-01718 W 20/COO Book KCE Library (10.124) Available Readers who borrowed this document also borrowed:
Utilization-focused evaluation Patton, Michael Quinn Evidence for policy and decision-making Argyrous, George Future elderly living conditions in Europe Gaymu, Joëlle Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials Denzin, Norman K., Lincoln, Yvonna S. Key Concepts in Medical Sociology Gabe, Jonathan La rigueur du qualitatif De Sardan, Olivier Le burn-out du soignant Delbrouck, Michel Strategies of qualitative inquiry Denzin, Norman K., Lincoln, Yvonna S. Basics of qualitative research Corbin, Juliet The landscape of qualitative research Denzin, Norman K., Lincoln, Yvonna S. The desktop guide to complementary and alternative medicine Ernst, Edzard MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING / Peter, C. Gotzsche / Oxford ; Seattle [Wash.] : Radcliffe (2012)
MAMMOGRAPHY SCREENING : Truth, lies and controversy [printed text] / Peter, C. Gotzsche, Author . - Oxford ; Seattle [Wash.] : Radcliffe, 2012 . - 400 p. : ill. ; 22cm.
ISBN : 978-1-84619-585-3 : £24,
Languages : English (eng)
Descriptors: Indexation
Education, Medical, Continuing ; Mass Screening ; Neoplasms ; Palliative Care ; Public Health
Classification
WP 815 Breast -- Examination. Diagnosis. Diagnostic methods. MonitoringAbstract: 'This book gives plenty of examples of ad hominem attacks, intimidation, slander, threats of litigation, deception, dishonesty, lies and other violations of good scientific practice. For some years I kept a folder labeled Dishonesty in breast cancer screening on top of my filing cabinet, storing articles and letters to the editor that contained statements I knew were dishonest. Eventually I gave up on the idea of writing a paper about this collection, as the number of examples quickly exceeded what could be contained in a single article. Contents note: Foreword by Iona Heath -- Foreword by Iona Heath -- Foreword by Fran Visco -- Acknowledgements -- Introduction -- What it really means to be ‘controversial’ -- Our collaboration with the media -- Important issues in cancer screening -- What it means ‘to have cancer’ -- Overdiagnosis and overtreatment -- Erroneous diagnoses and carcinoma in situ -- Basic issues in cancer epidemiology -- Randomised trials, observational studies and a little statistics -- Why screening leads to misleading survival statistics -- Why 10--year survival is also misleading -- Does screening work in Sweden? -- Stonewalling the Cochrane report on screening -- The Danish National Board of Health interferes with our report -- Troubling results in the Lancet -- The Canadian trials -- Media storm -- Email from researchers -- Our collaboration with the trialists -- Ten letters to the editor -- Creative manipulations in Sweden -- Peter Dean, a remarkable character -- Bad manners also in Norway -- Continued troubles in Denmark -- Harms dismissed by the Cochrane Breast Cancer Group -- The process with the Cochrane review -- Of mites and men -- Confusion over who is in charge -- The Lancet publishes the harms of screening -- Vitriolic mass email from Peter Dean -- Beating about the bush in the United Kingdom -- Condemnations in Sweden -- Contempt of science in Denmark and Norway -- Delayed media storm in the United States after our 2001 reviews -- Miettinen and Henschke’s cherry--picking in the Lancet -- Additional reactions in the United States -- The Danish National Board of Health circles the wagons -- US and Swedish 2002 meta--analyses -- US Preventive Services Task Force’s meta--analysis -- Nyström’s updated Swedish meta—analysis -- Scientific debates in the United States -- Peter Dean is wrong again -- Multiple errors in the International Journal of Epidemiology -- Publication of entire Cochrane review obstructed for 5 years -- Cochrane editors stonewall our Cochrane review -- Lessons for the future -- Welcome results in France -- Editorial misconduct in the European Journal of Cancer -- Editorial misconduct -- Threats, intimidation and falsehoods -- Debates in the Scientist and the Cancer Letter -- Tabár’s ‘beyond reason’ studies -- Criticism of our work in the Journal of Surgical Oncology -- Other observational studies of breast cancer mortality -- The United States and the United Kingdom -- Denmark, Lynge’s 2005 study -- Denmark, our 2010 study -- Overdiagnosis and overtreatment -- Cancers that regress spontaneously -- The 1986 UK Forrest report -- Overdiagnosis in the randomised trials -- Systematic review of overdiagnosis in observational studies -- Observational studies from Denmark and New South Wales -- The doubt industry -- Duffy’s studies on overdiagnosis -- Lynge’s studies on overdiagnosis -- Carcinoma in situ and the increase in mastectomies -- Ad hominem attacks: a measure of desperation? -- UK statistician publishes in Danish -- Inappropriate name—dropping -- Further ad hominem arguments -- Lynge’s unholy mixture of politics and science -- Ad hominem attacks ad infinitum -- US recommendations for women aged 40–49 years -- What have women been told? -- Website information on screening -- Invitations to screening -- A scandalous revision of the Danish screening leaflet -- Our screening leaflet -- Breast screening: the facts, or maybe not -- American Cancer Society -- Information from other cancer societies -- Getting funding or not getting funding -- What do women believe? -- Extraordinary exaggerations -- What is the ratio between benefits and harms? -- Duffy’s ‘funny’ numbers -- Exaggerating 25—fold -- The exaggerations finally backfire -- The ultimate exaggeration -- Tabár threatens the BMJ with litigation -- Falsehoods and perceived censorship in Sweden -- Celebrating 20 years of breast screening in the United Kingdom -- Can screening work? -- Plausible effect based on tumour sizes in the trials -- Lead time -- Plausible effect based on tumour stages in the trials -- No decrease in advanced cancers -- Where is screening at today? -- Problems with reading mammograms -- False promises -- Important information is being ignored -- Beliefs warp evidence at conferences -- Does breast screening make women live longer? -- Where next? -- Is screening a religion? -- A press release from Radiology that wasn’t -- Has all my struggle achieved anything? -- Why has so much evidence about screening been distorted? -- Time to stop breast cancer screening -- Appendix 1: Tabár’s explanations in the Cancer Letter and our replies -- Appendix 2: Our 2008 mam-mography screening leaflet -- Appendix 3: The press release Radiology withdrew at the last minute -- Index Record link: https://kce.docressources.info/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=2927 Hold
Place a hold on this item
Copies(1)
Barcode Call number Media type Location Section Status 10273-02475 WP 815 / GOT Book KCE Library (10.124) Available Readers who borrowed this document also borrowed:
Dois-je me faire tester pour le cancer ? Welch, H. Gilbert Dictionnaire d'épidémiologie Last, John M. (1926-....) Breast cancer screening Glossaire des termes utilisés en Evidence-Based Medicine De Cort, Paul European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis Perry, N.